Thursday, May 14, 2009

Earth is growing! Do not believe the lies!

Pangea is a lie!This was described by my friend Grodon as the "happiest conspiracy theory I've ever seen."

WARNING: It totally blows the whole continental drift theory out of the water!



At 7:25:
As we now go forward in time from 185 million years ago, please notice there is no subduction. No raising and lowering of land masses, there can't be! IT'S HELL IN THE FORM OF MAGMA DOWN THERE!

13 comments:

Galspanic said...

I love all or nothing theories.

Litcube said...

So do I!

Mr. Pony said...

Calling the Pangaea theory "knee-jerk" was the ballsiest thing I've heard this week, probably.

I also like theorists that suggest that the scientific community clings to old scientific assumptions because they are simply afraid of the new, and not that the older theories have been upheld by observation or experimentation or anything.

I really like the narrator, and I hope he's the scientist responsible for this theory. And I hope that he's this Neal Adams.

Mr. Pony said...

Hey, just one cotton-picking minute! Where did all the water come from?

Fugu said...

Holycrap 54,000 comments on this video.

Subduction is impossible because of... magma... but it's okay that the Earth is growing in size with no possible means of increasing it's mass to such a scale. Fruitcake.

But then it hit me--and maybe this is in one of his other videos--but it must be because THE EARTH IS HOLLOW!!!

Sure there's no reason for a giant gas bubble to expand inside the center of the earth, but that's gotta be it, and it explains all those old sci-fi movies, too! The dinosaurs must have fallen into the cracks millions of years ago and they're still alive after the asteroids wiped out the ones left on the surface!



"Man I love this map!"

Mr. Pony said...

That's just it, Fugu. The reason scientists are so terrified of this theory is because if it's true, everything we think we know is wrong, even what we think we know about molecules! This would mean that we would have to start science over completely, because this particular interpretation of data available on the Internet demands it!!

The very last thing scientists want to do is more science! If you don't believe me, show this movie to your dad and tell him that it looks like he's going to have to come out of retirement to redo Geology, and look at his face. If he looks like he wants to punch you, then you know the inflationary earth theory MUST be correct!!!

Galspanic said...

Fuge clearly needs to do that.

AI-BU9 said...

Yay! I anxiously await the IV on V smack-down. Let the melée commence!

odori said...

I found the water part most bewildering. This link has Neal Adams saying this:

"Going backward in time, in fact the percentage of the Earth covered with water would remain nearly the same... About two thirds. This is because when there were no deep seas on the earth, there were, what were called shallow seas covering two-thirds of the land. This process from one to the other was gradual and evolutionary."

Hmmm....??

Fugu said...

IV said that this was actually an old RUSSIAN theory prevailing until about the 1970s, at which point they sucked it up and admitted defeat to all the Western Data pointing towards plate tectonics.

IV then proceeded to try and explain the science behind plate tectonics, but it was so complicated and technical that I couldn't understand any of it, which means it must therefore be wrong!

I think the wiser option is to shun these things we don't comprehend, and instead stand behind a much stupider but simpler explanation, which must be right! Like the earth expanding like a balloon, or god or something.

Neal Adams doesn't sound very russian to me. Maybe he was one of those spies! A science spy.

O_O

Mr. Pony said...

Odori, even more astounding, he suggests that the hydrogen and oxygen that form the modern oceans are being generated at the earth's core, along with other elements. You know, if I had a theory that was based on the assumption that huge quantities of matter were being generated from nothing in a very specific spot in the universe, I might focus more on that part of the theory, and less on the part about the continents fitting together like a fun little puzzle.

Galspanic said...

Pone, that's so unlike you.

Litcube said...

"If I had a theory that was based on the assumption that huge quantities of matter were being generated from nothing in a very specific spot in the universe, I might focus more on that part of the theory, and less on the part about the continents fitting together like a fun little puzzle."

This is awesome.