Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Today will be like this:
Shoutbox
Recentest Comments
Labels
Previously
-
▼
2011
(95)
-
▼
April
(9)
- The First Zombie-Proof House
- Best dog impersonation of a Wookiee EVER.
- ATLAS and P-Body
- DIY X-men costumes on a budget
- Portal 2 Comic, Part One
- Storm: The Animated Movie
- The Most Disturbing Personality Test Ever
- 60 Completely Unusable Stock Photos (via @Dzhena)
- TED talk Mrs. Panic thought particularly interesting.
-
▼
April
(9)
Subscribe via RSS
JhonenV on Twitter
Please wait while my tweets load 
Search Pieces of Things...
Pieces of Things Admin
We're Everywhere
Total Pageviews; Last 7 Days
Add Some Sunshine to Your Day!
4 comments:
I think I won!
I'm curious as to what kind of science, if any is behind this test. FTR, it actually came kinda close, but not exact.
With a large enough subject group, you can generate meaningful data out of the most intentionally non-nonsensical questions. I've noticed this sort of science has been springing up more frequently due to internets.
Though most of these ask you simple demographic identification questions to correlate data. This one does not. Perhaps they did this prior.
1) Are you a man?
2) Is apple blunderfuck science dink?
If you ask a random billion people, you might extrapolate which gender are more likely to apple blunderfuck science dink.
Given a long enough timeline, neither will survive.
Post a Comment